Thursday, May 28, 2015

POLITICAL FISH MARKET IN NEWS ROOM

“HAR WAARDAAT (INCIDENCE) KE BAAD JAB NETA YAHAN PAR AATE HAIN, BAHAS KARNE KE BAHANE MUDDE (TOPIC) KO BHATKAATE (DIVERT) HAIN;
JINKA MAT (VOTE) LEKAR ISS MUKAAM TAK AATE HAIN, UNKO HI SAMAY AANE PAR KAISE AAP BHUL JAATE HAIN.”





If you are regular news viewer, then you already had understood by above lines that what I am up to this time. And many of you also feel the same but ignore all the facts. There are so many good news channels which had brought revolution in electronic media with their efforts and technology also had played great part in this growing industry. So competition is also growing at rapid pace and every channel wants to run breaking & exclusive news so that we get the news ASAP and they gain TRP. Some channels are really good and their editor, journalist and analyst panel is also good (I am not going to rate). But with increase in this competition and race of gaining TRP somewhere they are losing their charm due to which quantity of news is increasing and quality of news is diminishing (I will post another detailed post on this topic later).

Whenever any incidence occurs, all news channels publishes it as breaking news and then every channel calls the panel of analyst who can share their thoughts on that news. This is the beginning of story which I want to highlight in this post. Every day you can see debate airing live on many channels where politicians are invited to share their thoughts and give answers to the viewers. But if you watch those debates than you’ll regret watching them and think of watching any laughter show instead. They never do justification to the topic and debate never gets to the conclusion. Some time it becomes worst than the fish market situation in the news room and everyone starts his own new topic or start blame game on each other and divert us from main topic so that we never get the conclusion and program ends due to restriction of time. I am not blaming media for not getting to the conclusion but I must question the system in which they conduct debate.

Normally they conducts debate episodes of 30 mins (1 hr in some cases) with 3 or 4 panel members on average basis for representing their party view on the incidence. In those 30 mins approximately 10 min are deducted for advertisement slot which is also necessary for channels to play as they earn their bread and butter from it.  20 mins are left with them to make a discussion on the given topic that will turn to 5 mins avg for every panelist to present their view. Now I challenge any one, if same 5 mins are provided to any college student he will present better views than our politicians on the same topic and also give some conclusive idea. So where is the real problem, in politicians or news channel?  I think politicians attitude and media channels ignorance toward their attitude is the main problem.

The main fact is that politicians (who ever whether ruling party or opponent) play with media restriction as they know they have very limited time to conduct the show, also they have to run promotional adds in between. They already has that analysis in mind which I explained earlier and they know very well that what they have to do if anything will not go in their favor or if they are unanswerable. They just have to divert the topic for 5 min (their avg discussion time) by starting blame game on each other which results in media room becoming fish market and some time in this outburst they speak some out of the planet facts.  They don’t even care they are answerable to us and we want to see the actions and vision of politicians towards any incidence. When they can play with whole country sentiments so playing with media is very small thing for them. By ignoring these facts media somehow is also playing supportive role and damaging their image in the race of TRP because politicians blame them for not giving the time to speak and hide their face easily.

That is the reason why I blamed system of media channels earlier. They have to change the way they conduct the debates otherwise in the race of gaining TRP they will be lost somewhere in mob. There are many ways they can improve the quality which depends on their creative team but I also want to put my suggestion which if introduced will be helpful for the viewers to get the conclusion and also benefit channels TRP by conducting healthy debate. As I had given my calculation earlier so here I will take scenario one where the show time is 30 mins.

As in this scenario the main discussion time is 20 min and let us assume there are 4 panel members, so firstly divide 5 min for each.  Now before conducting the discussion inform every panelist that make sure not to divert the topic (for which channel have to take an action if they want to save their image). Now divide that 5 min in 3 slots of 90 sec each (30 sec still left) which means every person will get 3 chances to speak. Now make sure no one else can speak in between of other person turn. Now start the discussion with introduction of the topic where they can present their or party’s views on the subject nothing other than that. In second part they object on each other’s views and also answer the journalist question. In third and last part they will answer the remaining questions arises during the discussion (make sure it is related to subject) and also they can send their party message to the viewers what action is expected from their side. Remaining 30 sec each is kept for the safe side as in practical approach it is not possible to follow word to word but channel have to follow the timing. So this 30 sec each that means total of 2mins can be used by journalist to bring the discussion on track if it seems to be going out of subject.

So I appeal to media channel to consider this thought or bring any other change as per them to show the real face of politics otherwise they will not suffer but you will suffer some day and will be lost in mob. I know there are many good journalist and editors (I will not name any) who are very impressive and easily conduct good discussion and they also feel pity when discussion ends without conclusion. But the only problem is ignorance which they do and citizens also do by not raising their voice. Politicians will do their politics or (POLLUTE-TRICS) and will not stop playing with system unless and until we ignite ourselves to bring change.

JAI HIND!!!!



YOU CAN SEE MY OTHER POSTS AT:


NOTE: - THIS IS SMALL INITIATIVE STARTED FROM MY SIDE TO AWARE PEOPLE OF THEIR RIGHTS AND DUTIES. MANY THINGS ARE THERE WHICH WE CAN CHANGE IN OUR SOCIETY WITHOUT INTERRUPTING DAY TO DAY LIFE. SO I WANT YOUR SMALL CONTRIBUTION IN THIS INITIATIVE THAT IF YOU LIKE ANY OF MY POST DOESN’T FORGET TO SHARE IT WITH OTHERS AS IT CAN BE HELPFUL FOR ANYONE WHICH YOU NEVER KNOW. SO YOUR ONE SHARE CAN ADD SOME CONTRIBUTION IN NATION PROGRESS.

DISCLAIMER: All the opinion and analysis written in this article is my personal view. My purpose is only to aware people and encourages them to take some part in nation development. Any queries/complaint/feedback can be sent at:



No comments:

Post a Comment